When the Debate is About Borders
Many of you will be aware of my relative social liberalism from some of my past work on this blog. I support social liberalism in a range of areas of public policy. I like to think of myself as very liberal – not to be confused with Liberal, when considering the plight of asylum seekers and refugees. Again, I have written strongly in favour of recognising and embracing these very vulnerable people in our society and in countries across the globe. To that end, it might surprise you to know that I am somewhat in agreement with the Liberal Party this week.
On Tuesday, an asylum seeker vessel carrying 66 passengers, reportedly bound for New Zealand reached the mainland of Australia at Geraldton in Western Australia. The ship, coming directly from Sri Lanka made it much further than a boat has for some time. And it immediately sparked heated debate, as the issue does at the best of times, as well as a review of our surveillance measures. Again, talk turned to the question of our “borders” and “border security”.
The arrival of asylum seekers in our waters is often considered a breach of our borders by the Liberal Party. We are consistently reminded that Labor has “lost control of our borders”. That happens even when Customs and Border Protection patrols intercept boats carrying asylum seekers well away from our shores and often, it seems, in the vicinity of Christmas Island.
It is not true to say in those instances that such a circumstance means we have a problem maintaining our borders. In fact it is wildly over the top and completely irresponsible to suggest as much. When our authorities are successful at intercepting boats, any boats which are foreign, they are in fact maintaining our borders in a successful manner. Any attempt to persuade us otherwise should be viewed with disdain.
On the other hand, if you have a vessel reaching the Australian mainland without being detected, then this is potentially an issue of border security. This somewhat unusual event is a potential issue of border security, not because asylum seekers are evil and must be stopped – they are most certainly not and should be received with care and compassion.
The reason why there should be concern is not necessarily about asylum seekers arriving on the mainland undetected. Some arrivals are inevitably deemed a security risk by the security agency ASIO, though unfortunately at this stage those assessments cannot be appealed. Rather, asylum seekers arriving on the mainland, as has been argued, shows a lapse in surveillance endeavours which could be exploited by people who wish to perpetrate real and actual harm.
It is important that we take that risk seriously. A review into our border security activities has already been ordered by Home Affairs Minister Jason Clare in the wake of the events in Geraldton, and that is the right thing to do. What must not be pursued are severe policy overreactions and dangerous displays of rhetoric which seek to blur the actual issue and incite unnecessary fear in the community.
There should be some limited concern about border security issues when there is actually a breach of our borders. Boats of any kind which are actually intercepted in the ocean are not and should never be considered a breach of our borders by any political party seeking to gain political capital.
Sadly, that will continue to be the case, as the race to the bottom will continue apace.
Posted on April 12, 2013, in Australian politics and tagged ALP, asylum seekers, Australian politics, border security, Geraldton, language, Liberal Party, refugees. Bookmark the permalink. 14 Comments.
In theory I agree, although I feel that the argument reagrding “border security” is often bandied around as a convenient cover for getting tough on asylum seekers. We all know it’s been a vote winner and goodness knows both sides could do with the boost at the moment. I fear this is a precurser to another fear campaign in a desperate attempt to grab votes. The ultimate losers are the poor people who have no choice but to traverse the sea in a leaky boat. I have blogged about this in the past over at my place. I am saddened to see it resurface now, but not surprised.
I certainly agree that it is misused and that is a point I tried to make. And I don’t think the fear campaign has ceased – there was just a lull in the barrage of hostility. The job of government when something like this happens is to use sensible language and not make a problem out of nothing.
Painting asylum seekers as deviant and criminal, and then getting tough on border security is a very sad way to win an election, yet there it is. It deeply saddens me. These are people, not statistics, and they are not bad people and not criminals. Where did we go so wrong?
My guess is with politicians’ innate thirst for power. Causes them to do some quite silly things and preying on fear is but one way they maintain power.
There’s also an argument that it is a hangover from the White Australia Policy and I am somewhat convinced about that argument. But then, we had a great intake of refugees after the war and especially after Vietnam, so maybe politicians just need to lead by example.
Here’s my piece on this issue
http://stephrogers.com/2013/02/27/on-asylum-seekers-and-mandatory-dentention-in-australia/
It does seem we have similar opinions!
It appears so! Nice piece. I seem to have written a lot about the issue in recent months in particular – usually with each stupid statement or policy move, and there has been a few!
Thanks! I come at my politics from a very human perspective, but I make no apologies for that. I’ve been following your blog for quite some time but never really commented before, I do enjoy your posts. They are thought provoking.
I am both socially liberal and economically liberal. Doesn’t mean I completely agree with both, but I take the good bits from both. My background (as you may have seen) is human rights at uni which I am hoping to get back to in the form of a master of human rights in the 2nd half of the year.
Oh good luck with that! I’m about to head back to Uni myself. I’m going to attempt a Masters of Teaching.
Cheers. Second Masters. That is impressive
I haven’t got it yet, I’m just enrolling
Ahh. Well good luck!
Reblogged this on ThePoliticalIdealist.com.